Add note about mailing list

diff --git a/README b/README
index faef3ff47397f6948984aa94fecaa6ae2674651a..0c02778632e0cb42b5e20cbd2634d9f78a942ec3 100644 (file)
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -15,6 +15,13 @@ documentation in 'doc/README.first'.
 There are some manual pages and READMEs in the doc sub-directory.  The
 TODO file is an incomplete list of things needing to be done.
 
 There are some manual pages and READMEs in the doc sub-directory.  The
 TODO file is an incomplete list of things needing to be done.
 

+There's a mailing list for discussion, development of and help with
+dak.  See:
+
+  http://mailman.nocrew.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dak-disc
+
+for archives and details on how to subscribe.
+

 dak is developed and used on Linux but will probably work under any
 UNIX since it's almost entirely python and shell scripts.
 
 dak is developed and used on Linux but will probably work under any
 UNIX since it's almost entirely python and shell scripts.
 

diff --git a/katie.py b/katie.py
index 996ae0283fef263e5bacc98c27031e7032adc7a0..a46b729abc1ce234934b8bc0ba233e7b8953dee0 100644 (file)
--- a/katie.py
+++ b/katie.py
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 # Utility functions for katie
 # Copyright (C) 2001, 2002  James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
 
 # Utility functions for katie
 # Copyright (C) 2001, 2002  James Troup <james@nocrew.org>

-# $Id: katie.py,v 1.27 2002-10-16 02:47:32 troup Exp $
+# $Id: katie.py,v 1.28 2003-01-20 19:13:23 troup Exp $

 
 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 
 # This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
 # it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by


@@ -460,11 +460,11 @@ distribution.""";
                     # Ignore this; it's a common mistake and not worth whining about
                     if section.lower() == "non-us/main" and override_section.lower() == "non-us":
                         continue;
                     # Ignore this; it's a common mistake and not worth whining about
                     if section.lower() == "non-us/main" and override_section.lower() == "non-us":
                         continue;

-                    summary += "%s: section is overridden from %s to %s.\n" % (file, section, override_section);
+                    summary += "%s: package says section is %s, override says %s.\n" % (file, section, override_section);

                 priority = files[file]["priority"];
                 override_priority = files[file]["override priority"];
                 if priority != override_priority and priority != "-":
                 priority = files[file]["priority"];
                 override_priority = files[file]["override priority"];
                 if priority != override_priority and priority != "-":

-                    summary += "%s: priority is overridden from %s to %s.\n" % (file, priority, override_priority);
+                    summary += "%s: package says priority is %s, override says %s.\n" % (file, priority, override_priority);

 
         if summary == "":
             return;
 
         if summary == "":
             return;