* config/debian/extensions.py: Add infrastructure for replacing
functions in dak modules; add upload blocking for dpkg.
+2008-03-12 Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
+
+ * dak/edit_transitions.py: Done a number of cleanups to make code
+ working. Also changed the way prompting/answering goes, to not
+ have to import daklib/queue.
+ (edit_transitions): When done with a successful edit - also print
+ a final overview about defined transitions
+
+2008-03-11 Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
+
+ * dak/process_unchecked.py: Import syck module directly, not "from
+ syck import *"
+ (check_transition): Do the check for sourceful upload in here
+ Also adjust the syck loading commands, rename new_vers to
+ expected, curvers to current, to make it more clear what they mean.
+
+ * daklib/database.py (get_suite_version): Renamed from
+ get_testing_version. Also changed the cache variables name
+
+ * The above changes are based on modifications from Anthony.
+
+ * dak/dak.py (init): Renamed check -> edit transitions
+
+ * dak/edit_transitions.py: Renamed from check_transitions.py
+ (main): Also rename new_vers/curvers to expected/current
+ Basically a nice rewrite, so it now does checks and edit,
+ depending on how you call it. Check also removes old transitions,
+ if user wants it.
+
+2008-03-02 Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
+
+ * debian/control (Suggests): Add python-syck to Depends:
+
+ * dak/dak.py (init): Tell it about check_transitions
+
+ * dak/check_transitions.py (usage): Added, checks the transitions
+ file (if any)
+
+ * daklib/database.py (get_testing_version): Added. Returns the
+ version for the source in testing, if any
+
+ * dak/process_unchecked.py (check_transition): Added. Checks if a
+ release team member defined a transition, and rejects based on
+ that data.
+ (process_it): Use it.
+ (check_transition): Warn on broken transitions file and return,
+ not doing anything.
+ (check_transition): Moved out of here, into daklib/queue
+ (process_it): Call check_transitions only if
+ changes[architecture] has source included.
+ (check_transition): Now call the database.get_testing_version
+
2008-02-06 Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
* daklib/utils.py (check_signature): Make variable key available,
Reject
{
NoSourceOnly "true";
+ ReleaseTransitions "/srv/ftp.debian.org/testing/hints/transitions.yaml";
};
};
-import sys, os
+import sys, os, textwrap
+
+import apt_pkg
+import daklib.utils, daklib.database
+import syck
import daklib.extensions
from daklib.extensions import replace_dak_function
+def check_transition():
+ changes = dak_module.changes
+ reject = dak_module.reject
+ Cnf = dak_module.Cnf
+
+ sourcepkg = changes["source"]
+
+ # No sourceful upload -> no need to do anything else, direct return
+ if "source" not in changes["architecture"]:
+ return
+
+ # Also only check if there is a file defined (and existant) with
+ # checks.
+ transpath = Cnf.get("Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions", "")
+ if transpath == "" or not os.path.exists(transpath):
+ return
+
+ # Parse the yaml file
+ sourcefile = file(transpath, 'r')
+ sourcecontent = sourcefile.read()
+ try:
+ transitions = syck.load(sourcecontent)
+ except syck.error, msg:
+ # This shouldn't happen, there is a wrapper to edit the file which
+ # checks it, but we prefer to be safe than ending up rejecting
+ # everything.
+ daklib.utils.warn("Not checking transitions, the transitions file is broken: %s." % (msg))
+ return
+
+ # Now look through all defined transitions
+ for trans in transitions:
+ t = transitions[trans]
+ source = t["source"]
+ expected = t["new"]
+
+ # Will be None if nothing is in testing.
+ current = daklib.database.get_suite_version(source, "testing")
+ if current is not None:
+ compare = apt_pkg.VersionCompare(current, expected)
+
+ if current is None or compare < 0:
+ # This is still valid, the current version in testing is older than
+ # the new version we wait for, or there is none in testing yet
+
+ # Check if the source we look at is affected by this.
+ if sourcepkg in t['packages']:
+ # The source is affected, lets reject it.
+
+ rejectmsg = "%s: part of the %s transition.\n\n" % (
+ sourcepkg, trans)
+
+ if current is not None:
+ currentlymsg = "at version %s" % (current)
+ else:
+ currentlymsg = "not present in testing"
+
+ rejectmsg += "Transition description: %s\n\n" % (t["reason"])
+
+ rejectmsg += "\n".join(textwrap.wrap("""Your package
+is part of a testing transition designed to get %s migrated (it is
+currently %s, we need version %s). This transition is managed by the
+Release Team, and %s is the Release-Team member responsible for it.
+Please mail debian-release@lists.debian.org or contact %s directly if you
+need further assistance."""
+ % (source, currentlymsg, expected,t["rm"], t["rm"])))
+
+ reject(rejectmsg + "\n")
+ return
+
@replace_dak_function("process-unchecked", "check_signed_by_key")
def check_signed_by_key(oldfn):
changes = dak_module.changes
oldfn()
-
+ check_transition()
"Clean cruft from incoming"),
("clean-proposed-updates",
"Remove obsolete .changes from proposed-updates"),
-
+
+ ("edit-transitions",
+ "Edit the release transition file"),
("check-overrides",
"Override cruft checks"),
("check-proposed-updates",
--- /dev/null
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+# Edit and then check the release managers transition file for correctness
+# and outdated transitions
+# Copyright (C) 2008 Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
+
+# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+# Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
+
+################################################################################
+
+# <elmo> if klecker.d.o died, I swear to god, I'm going to migrate to gentoo.
+
+################################################################################
+
+import os, pg, sys, time
+import apt_pkg
+import daklib.database
+import daklib.utils
+import syck
+
+# Globals
+Cnf = None
+Options = None
+projectB = None
+
+################################################################################
+
+def init():
+ global Cnf, Options, projectB
+
+ apt_pkg.init()
+
+ Cnf = daklib.utils.get_conf()
+
+ Arguments = [('h',"help","Edit-Transitions::Options::Help"),
+ ('e',"edit","Edit-Transitions::Options::Edit"),
+ ('c',"check","Edit-Transitions::Options::check"),
+ ('n',"no-action","Edit-Transitions::Options::No-Action")]
+
+ for i in ["help", "no-action", "edit", "check"]:
+ if not Cnf.has_key("Edit-Transitions::Options::%s" % (i)):
+ Cnf["Edit-Transitions::Options::%s" % (i)] = ""
+
+ apt_pkg.ParseCommandLine(Cnf, Arguments, sys.argv)
+
+ Options = Cnf.SubTree("Edit-Transitions::Options")
+
+ projectB = pg.connect(Cnf["DB::Name"], Cnf["DB::Host"], int(Cnf["DB::Port"]))
+ daklib.database.init(Cnf, projectB)
+
+ if Options["help"]:
+ usage()
+
+################################################################################
+
+def usage (exit_code=0):
+ print """Usage: edit_transitions [OPTION]...
+ Check the release managers transition file for correctness and outdated transitions
+ -h, --help show this help and exit.
+ -e, --edit edit the transitions file
+ -c, --check check the transitions file, remove outdated entries
+ -n, --no-action don't do anything
+
+ Called without an option this tool will check the transition file for outdated
+ transitions and remove them."""
+ sys.exit(exit_code)
+
+################################################################################
+
+def lock_file(lockfile):
+ retry = 0
+ while retry < 10:
+ try:
+ lock_fd = os.open(lockfile, os.O_RDONLY | os.O_CREAT | os.O_EXCL)
+ retry = 10
+ except OSError, e:
+ if errno.errorcode[e.errno] == 'EACCES' or errno.errorcode[e.errno] == 'EEXIST':
+ retry += 1
+ if (retry >= 10):
+ daklib.utils.fubar("Couldn't obtain lock for %s." % (lockfile) )
+ else:
+ print("Unable to get lock for %s (try %d of 10)" % (lockfile, retry) )
+ time.sleep(60)
+ else:
+ raise
+
+
+################################################################################
+
+def edit_transitions():
+ trans_file = Cnf["Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions"]
+
+ tempfile = "./%s.transition.tmp" % (os.getpid() )
+
+ lockfile="%s.lock" % (tempfile)
+ lock_file(lockfile)
+
+ daklib.utils.copy(trans_file, tempfile)
+
+ editor = os.environ.get("EDITOR", "vi")
+
+ while True:
+ result = os.system("%s %s" % (editor, tempfile))
+ if result != 0:
+ os.unlink(tempfile)
+ os.unlink(lockfile)
+ daklib.utils.fubar("%s invocation failed for %s, not removing tempfile." % (editor, tempfile))
+
+ # Now try to load the new file
+ test = load_transitions(tempfile)
+
+ if test == None:
+ # Edit is broken
+ answer = "XXX"
+ prompt = "Broken edit: [E]dit again, Drop changes?"
+
+ while prompt.find(answer) == -1:
+ answer = daklib.utils.our_raw_input(prompt)
+ if answer == "":
+ answer = "E"
+ answer = answer[:1].upper()
+
+ if answer == 'E':
+ continue
+ elif answer == 'D':
+ os.unlink(tempfile)
+ os.unlink(lockfile)
+ print "OK, discarding changes"
+ sys.exit(0)
+ else:
+ # No problems in loading the new file, jump out of the while loop
+ break
+
+ # We seem to be done and also have a working file. Copy over.
+ daklib.utils.copy(tempfile, trans_file, True)
+ os.unlink(tempfile)
+ os.unlink(lockfile)
+
+ # Before we finish print out transition info again
+ print "\n\n------------------------------------------------------------------------"
+ print "Edit done, file saved, currently defined transitions:\n"
+ transitions = load_transitions(Cnf["Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions"])
+ transition_info(transitions)
+
+################################################################################
+
+def load_transitions(trans_file):
+ # Parse the yaml file
+ sourcefile = file(trans_file, 'r')
+ sourcecontent = sourcefile.read()
+ try:
+ trans = syck.load(sourcecontent)
+ except syck.error, msg:
+ # Someone fucked it up
+ print "ERROR: %s" % (msg)
+ return None
+ return trans
+
+################################################################################
+
+def print_info(trans, source, expected, rm, reason, packages):
+ print """
+Looking at transition: %s
+ Source: %s
+ New Version: %s
+ Responsible: %s
+ Description: %s
+ Blocked Packages (total: %d): %s
+""" % (trans, source, expected, rm, reason, len(packages), ", ".join(packages))
+ return
+
+################################################################################
+
+def transition_info(transitions):
+ for trans in transitions:
+ t = transitions[trans]
+ source = t["source"]
+ expected = t["new"]
+
+ # Will be None if nothing is in testing.
+ current = daklib.database.get_suite_version(source, "testing")
+
+ print_info(trans, source, expected, t["rm"], t["reason"], t["packages"])
+
+ if current == None:
+ # No package in testing
+ print "Transition source %s not in testing, transition still ongoing." % (source)
+ else:
+ compare = apt_pkg.VersionCompare(current, expected)
+ print "Apt compare says: %s" % (compare)
+ if compare < 0:
+ # This is still valid, the current version in database is older than
+ # the new version we wait for
+ print "This transition is still ongoing, we currently have version %s" % (current)
+ else:
+ print "This transition is over, the target package reached testing, should be removed"
+ print "%s wanted version: %s, has %s" % (source, expected, current)
+ print "-------------------------------------------------------------------------"
+
+################################################################################
+
+def check_transitions(transitions):
+ to_dump = 0
+ to_remove = []
+ # Now look through all defined transitions
+ for trans in transitions:
+ t = transitions[trans]
+ source = t["source"]
+ expected = t["new"]
+
+ # Will be None if nothing is in testing.
+ current = daklib.database.get_suite_version(source, "testing")
+
+ print_info(trans, source, expected, t["rm"], t["reason"], t["packages"])
+
+ if current == None:
+ # No package in testing
+ print "Transition source %s not in testing, transition still ongoing." % (source)
+ else:
+ compare = apt_pkg.VersionCompare(current, expected)
+ print "Apt compare says: %s" % (compare)
+ if compare < 0:
+ # This is still valid, the current version in database is older than
+ # the new version we wait for
+ print "This transition is still ongoing, we currently have version %s" % (current)
+ else:
+ print "REMOVE: This transition is over, the target package reached testing. REMOVE"
+ print "%s wanted version: %s, has %s" % (source, expected, current)
+ to_remove.append(trans)
+ to_dump = 1
+ print "-------------------------------------------------------------------------"
+
+ if to_dump:
+ prompt = "Removing: "
+ for remove in to_remove:
+ prompt += remove
+ prompt += ","
+
+ prompt += " Commit Changes? (y/N)"
+ answer = ""
+
+ if Options["no-action"]:
+ answer="n"
+ else:
+ answer = daklib.utils.our_raw_input(prompt).lower()
+
+ if answer == "":
+ answer = "n"
+
+ if answer == 'n':
+ print "Not committing changes"
+ sys.exit(0)
+ elif answer == 'y':
+ print "Committing"
+ for remove in to_remove:
+ del transitions[remove]
+ destfile = file(Cnf["Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions"], 'w')
+ syck.dump(transitions, destfile)
+ print "Done"
+ else:
+ print "WTF are you typing?"
+ sys.exit(0)
+
+
+################################################################################
+
+def main():
+ global Cnf
+
+ init()
+
+ # Only check if there is a file defined (and existant) with checks. It's a little bit
+ # specific to Debian, not much use for others, so return early there.
+ if not Cnf.has_key("Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions") or not os.path.exists("%s" % (Cnf["Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions"])):
+ daklib.utils.warn("Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions not defined or file %s not existant." %
+ (Cnf["Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions"]))
+ sys.exit(1)
+
+ # Parse the yaml file
+ transitions = load_transitions(Cnf["Dinstall::Reject::ReleaseTransitions"])
+ if transitions == None:
+ # Something very broken with the transitions, exit
+ daklib.utils.warn("Not doing any work, someone fucked up the transitions file outside our control")
+ sys.exit(2)
+
+ if Options["edit"]:
+ # Output information about the currently defined transitions.
+ print "Currently defined transitions:"
+ transition_info(transitions)
+ daklib.utils.our_raw_input("Press enter to continue...")
+
+ # Lets edit the transitions file
+ edit_transitions()
+ elif Options["check"]:
+ # Check and remove outdated transitions
+ check_transitions(transitions)
+ else:
+ # Output information about the currently defined transitions.
+ transition_info(transitions)
+
+ # Nothing requested, doing nothing besides the above display of the transitions
+ sys.exit(0)
+
+
+################################################################################
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+ main()
fingerprint_id_cache = {}
queue_id_cache = {}
uid_id_cache = {}
+suite_version_cache = {}
################################################################################
return source_id
+def get_suite_version(source, suite):
+ global suite_version_cache
+ cache_key = "%s_%s" % (source, suite)
+
+ if suite_version_cache.has_key(cache_key):
+ return suite_version_cache[cache_key]
+
+ q = projectB.query("""
+ SELECT s.version FROM source s, suite su, src_associations sa
+ WHERE sa.source=s.id
+ AND sa.suite=su.id
+ AND su.suite_name='%s'
+ AND s.source='%s'"""
+ % (suite, source))
+
+ if not q.getresult():
+ return None
+
+ version = q.getresult()[0][0]
+ suite_version_cache[cache_key] = version
+
+ return version
+
################################################################################
def get_or_set_maintainer_id (maintainer):
Package: dak
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${python:Depends}, python-pygresql, python2.1-email | python (>= 2.2), python-apt, apt-utils, gnupg (>= 1.0.6-1), ${shlibs:Depends}, dpkg-dev
+Depends: ${python:Depends}, python-pygresql, python2.1-email | python (>= 2.2), python-apt, apt-utils, gnupg (>= 1.0.6-1), ${shlibs:Depends}, dpkg-dev, python-syck (>= 0.61.2-1)
Suggests: lintian, linda, less, binutils-multiarch, symlinks, postgresql (>= 7.1.0), dsync
Description: Debian's archive maintenance scripts
This is a collection of archive maintenance scripts used by the
--- /dev/null
+Contents:
+
+1. Little "Howto Use it"
+2. Explanation of how it works
+
+
+1. Little "Howto Use it"
+------------------------
+
+The input file is in YAML format. Do bnot bother with comments, they
+will be removed.
+
+The format: Dont use tabs for indentation, use spaces.
+
+Strings should be within "", but normally work without.
+Exception: Version-numbers with an epoch really do want to be in
+"". YES, THEY WANT TO (or they get interpreted in a way you dont expect
+it).
+
+Keys (The order of them does not matter, only the indentation):
+
+short_tag: A short tag for the transition, like apt_update
+ reason: One-line reason what is intended with it
+ source: Source package that needs to transition
+ new: New version of the target package
+ rm: Name of the Release Team member responsible for this transition
+ packages: Array of package names that are affected by this transition
+
+
+The following example wants to
+a.) update apt to version 0.7.12, the responsible Release Team member
+is Andreas Barth, and it affects some apt related packages and
+b.) wants to do something similar for lintian.
+
+apt_update:
+ packages:
+ - apt
+ - synaptic
+ - cron-apt
+ - debtags
+ - feta
+ - apticron
+ - aptitude
+ reason: "Apt needs to transition to testing to get foo and bar done"
+ source: apt
+ new: 0.7.12
+ rm: Andreas Barth
+lintian_breakage:
+ reason: "Testing a new feature"
+ source: lintian
+ new: 1.23.45~bpo40+1
+ rm: Ganneff
+ packages:
+ - lintian
+ - python-syck
+
+
+########################################################################
+########################################################################
+
+
+2. Explanation of how it works
+------------------------------
+
+Assume the following transition is defined:
+
+lintian_funtest:
+ reason: "Testing a new feature"
+ source: lintian
+ new: 1.23.45~bpo40+1
+ rm: Ganneff
+ packages:
+ - lintian
+ - python-syck
+
+Also assume the lintian situation on this archive looks like this:
+ lintian | 1.23.28~bpo.1 | sarge-backports | source, all
+ lintian | 1.23.45~bpo40+1 | etch-backports | source, all
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Now, I try to upload a (NEW, but that makes no difference) version of
+python-syck:
+
+$ dak process-unchecked -n python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1_i386.changes
+
+python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1_i386.changes
+REJECT
+Rejected: python-syck: part of the lintian_funtest transition.
+
+Your package is part of a testing transition designed to get lintian migrated
+(it currently is at version 1.23.28~bpo.1, we need version 1.23.45~bpo40+1)
+
+Transition description: Testing a new feature
+
+This transition is managed by the Release Team, and Ganneff
+is the Release-Team member responsible for it.
+Please contact Ganneff or debian-release@lists.debian.org if you
+need further assistance.
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Lets change the definition of the transition, assume it is now:
+
+lintian_funtest:
+ reason: "Testing a new feature"
+ source: lintian
+ new: 1.22.28~bpo.1
+ rm: Ganneff
+ packages:
+ - lintian
+ - python-syck
+
+Which checks for a version older than the version actually available. Result:
+
+dak process-unchecked -n python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1_i386.changes
+
+python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1_i386.changes
+NEW for etch-backports
+(new) python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1.diff.gz extra python
+(new) python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1.dsc extra python
+(new) python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1_i386.deb extra python
+PySyck python bindings to the Syck YAML parser kit
+ Syck is a simple YAML parser kit.
+ .
+[...] the whole stuff about a new package.
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+For completness, change the transition to (exact existing version):
+lintian_funtest:
+ reason: "Testing a new feature"
+ source: lintian
+ new: 1.23.28~bpo.1
+ rm: Ganneff
+ packages:
+ - lintian
+
+and the result is:
+
+dak process-unchecked -n python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1_i386.changes
+
+python-syck_0.61.2-1~bpo40+1_i386.changes
+NEW for etch-backports
+[... we know this ...]
+
+------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+The second part is the check_transitions script.
+For that we take the following transitions as example:
+
+apt_update:
+ reason: "Apt needs to transition to testing to get foo and bar done"
+ source: apt
+ new: 0.2.12-1+b1.3
+ rm: Andreas Barth
+ packages:
+ - apt
+ - synaptic
+ - cron-apt
+ - debtags
+ - feta
+ - apticron
+ - aptitude
+lintian_funtest:
+ reason: "Testing a new feature"
+ source: lintian
+ new: 1.23.45~bpo40+1
+ rm: Ganneff
+ packages:
+ - lintian
+ - python-syck
+bar_breaks_it:
+ reason: We dont want bar to break it
+ source: bar
+ new: "9:99"
+ rm: Ganneff
+ packages:
+ - kdelibs
+ - qt4-x11
+ - libqt-perl
+
+Running check-transitions ends up with the following output:
+
+Looking at transition: lintian_funtest
+ Source: lintian
+ New Version: 1.23.45~bpo40+1
+ Responsible: Ganneff
+ Description: Testing a new feature
+ Blocked Packages (total: 2): lintian, python-syck
+
+Apt compare says: -2
+This transition is still ongoing, we currently have version 1.23.28~bpo.1
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Looking at transition: apt_update
+ Source: apt
+ New Version: 0.2.12-1+b1.3
+ Responsible: Andreas Barth
+ Description: Apt needs to transition to testing to get foo and bar done
+ Blocked Packages (total: 7): apt, synaptic, cron-apt, debtags, feta, apticron, aptitude
+
+Apt compare says: 4
+This transition is over, the target package reached testing, removing
+apt wanted version: 0.2.12-1+b1.3, has 0.6.46.4-0.1~bpo.1
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Looking at transition: bar_breaks_it
+ Source: bar
+ New Version: 9:99
+ Responsible: Ganneff
+ Description: We dont want bar to break it
+ Blocked Packages (total: 3): kdelibs, qt4-x11, libqt-perl
+
+Transition source bar not in testing, transition still ongoing.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+I: I would remove the apt_update transition
+
+
+Changing our transition definitions for lintian (keeping the rest as
+above) to
+
+lintian_funtest:
+ reason: "Testing a new feature"
+ source: lintian
+ new: 1.22.28~bpo.1
+ rm: Ganneff
+ packages:
+ - lintian
+ - python-syck
+
+now we get
+
+Looking at transition: lintian_funtest
+ Source: lintian
+ New Version: 1.22.28~bpo.1
+ Responsible: Ganneff
+ Description: Testing a new feature
+ Blocked Packages (total: 2): lintian, python-syck
+
+Apt compare says: 1
+This transition is over, the target package reached testing, removing
+lintian wanted version: 1.22.28~bpo.1, has 1.23.28~bpo.1
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Looking at transition: apt_update
+ Source: apt
+ New Version: 0.2.12-1+b1.3
+ Responsible: Andreas Barth
+ Description: Apt needs to transition to testing to get foo and bar done
+ Blocked Packages (total: 7): apt, synaptic, cron-apt, debtags, feta, apticron, aptitude
+
+Apt compare says: 4
+This transition is over, the target package reached testing, removing
+apt wanted version: 0.2.12-1+b1.3, has 0.6.46.4-0.1~bpo.1
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+Looking at transition: bar_breaks_it
+ Source: bar
+ New Version: 9:99
+ Responsible: Ganneff
+ Description: We dont want bar to break it
+ Blocked Packages (total: 3): kdelibs, qt4-x11, libqt-perl
+
+Transition source bar not in testing, transition still ongoing.
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------
+I: I would remove the lintian_funtest transition
+I: I would remove the apt_update transition
+
+
+Not using the -n switch would turn the I: in actual removals :)
+The check-transition command is meant for the release team to always run
+it when they change a transition definition. It checks if the yaml is
+valid and can be loaded (but if not the archive simply does no reject)
+and also shows a nice overview.
projects / dak.git / commitdiff