# Utility functions for katie
# Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
-# $Id: katie.py,v 1.51 2004-11-27 18:02:22 troup Exp $
+# $Id: katie.py,v 1.52 2005-01-14 14:07:17 ajt Exp $
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
"closes", "changes" ]:
d_changes[i] = changes[i];
# Optional changes fields
- for i in [ "changed-by", "filecontents", "format", "lisa note" ]:
+ for i in [ "changed-by", "filecontents", "format", "lisa note", "distribution-version" ]:
if changes.has_key(i):
d_changes[i] = changes[i];
## dsc
################################################################################
+ def get_anyversion(self, query_result, suite):
+ anyversion=None
+ anysuite = [suite] + self.Cnf.ValueList("Suite::%s::VersionChecks::Enhances" % (suite))
+ for (v, s) in query_result:
+ if s in [ string.lower(x) for x in anysuite ]:
+ if not anyversion or apt_pkg.VersionCompare(anyversion, v) <= 0:
+ anyversion=v
+ return anyversion
+
+ ################################################################################
+
def cross_suite_version_check(self, query_result, file, new_version):
"""Ensure versions are newer than existing packages in target
suites and that cross-suite version checking rules as
self.reject("%s: old version (%s) in %s >= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite));
if suite in must_be_older_than and \
apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, existent_version) > -1:
- self.reject("%s: old version (%s) in %s <= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite));
+ ch = self.pkg.changes
+ cansave = 0
+ if ch.get('distribution-version', {}).has_key(suite):
+ # we really use the other suite, ignoring the conflicting one ...
+ addsuite = ch["distribution-version"][suite]
+
+ add_version = self.get_anyversion(query_result, addsuite)
+ target_version = self.get_anyversion(query_result, target_suite)
+
+ if not add_version:
+ # not add_version can only happen if we map to a suite
+ # that doesn't enhance the suite we're propup'ing from.
+ # so "propup-ver x a b c; map a d" is a problem only if
+ # d doesn't enhance a.
+ #
+ # i think we could always propagate in this case, rather
+ # than complaining. either way, this isn't a REJECT issue
+ #
+ # And - we really should complain to the dorks who configured dak
+ self.reject("%s is mapped to, but not enhanced by %s - adding anyways" % (suite, addsuite), "Warning: ")
+ self.pkg.changes["distribution"][addsuite] = 1
+ cansave = 1
+ elif not target_version:
+ # not targets_version is true when the package is NEW
+ # we could just stick with the "...old version..." REJECT
+ # for this, I think.
+ self.reject("Won't propogate NEW packages.")
+ elif apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, add_version) < 0:
+ # propogation would be redundant. no need to reject though.
+ #self.reject("ignoring versionconflict: %s: old version (%s) in %s <= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite), "Warning: ");
+ self.reject("foo", "Warning: ")
+ cansave = 1
+ elif apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, add_version) > 0 and \
+ apt_pkg.VersionCompare(add_version, target_version) == 0:
+ # propogate!!
+ self.pkg.changes["distribution"][addsuite] = 1
+ cansave = 1
+
+ if not cansave:
+ self.reject("%s: old version (%s) in %s <= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite));
################################################################################