# Utility functions for katie
# Copyright (C) 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 James Troup <james@nocrew.org>
-# $Id: katie.py,v 1.45 2004-04-01 17:14:25 troup Exp $
+# $Id: katie.py,v 1.52 2005-01-14 14:07:17 ajt Exp $
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
re_isanum = re.compile (r"^\d+$");
re_default_answer = re.compile(r"\[(.*)\]");
-re_fdnic = re.compile("\n\n");
-re_bin_only_nmu_of_mu = re.compile("\.\d+\.\d+$");
-re_bin_only_nmu_of_nmu = re.compile("\.\d+$");
+re_fdnic = re.compile(r"\n\n");
+re_bin_only_nmu_of_mu = re.compile(r"\.\d+\.\d+$");
+re_bin_only_nmu_of_nmu = re.compile(r"\.\d+$");
###############################################################################
changes = pkg.changes;
dsc = pkg.dsc;
- (dsc_rfc822, dsc_name, dsc_email) = utils.fix_maintainer (dsc.get("maintainer",Cnf["Dinstall::MyEmailAddress"]).lower());
+ i = utils.fix_maintainer (dsc.get("maintainer",
+ Cnf["Dinstall::MyEmailAddress"]).lower());
+ (dsc_rfc822, dsc_rfc2047, dsc_name, dsc_email) = i;
# changes["changedbyname"] == dsc_name is probably never true, but better safe than sorry
if dsc_name == changes["maintainername"].lower() and \
(changes["changedby822"] == "" or changes["changedbyname"].lower() == dsc_name):
uploaders = dsc["uploaders"].lower().split(",");
uploadernames = {};
for i in uploaders:
- (rfc822, name, email) = utils.fix_maintainer (i.strip());
+ (rfc822, rfc2047, name, email) = utils.fix_maintainer (i.strip());
uploadernames[name] = "";
if uploadernames.has_key(changes["changedbyname"].lower()):
return 0;
d_files[file][i] = files[file][i];
## changes
# Mandatory changes fields
- for i in [ "distribution", "source", "architecture", "version", "maintainer",
- "urgency", "fingerprint", "changedby822", "changedbyname",
- "maintainername", "maintaineremail", "closes" ]:
+ for i in [ "distribution", "source", "architecture", "version",
+ "maintainer", "urgency", "fingerprint", "changedby822",
+ "changedby2047", "changedbyname", "maintainer822",
+ "maintainer2047", "maintainername", "maintaineremail",
+ "closes", "changes" ]:
d_changes[i] = changes[i];
# Optional changes fields
- # FIXME: changes should be mandatory
- for i in [ "changed-by", "maintainer822", "filecontents", "format",
- "changes", "lisa note" ]:
+ for i in [ "changed-by", "filecontents", "format", "lisa note", "distribution-version" ]:
if changes.has_key(i):
d_changes[i] = changes[i];
## dsc
- for i in [ "source", "version", "maintainer", "fingerprint", "uploaders",
- "bts changelog" ]:
+ for i in [ "source", "version", "maintainer", "fingerprint",
+ "uploaders", "bts changelog" ]:
if dsc.has_key(i):
d_dsc[i] = dsc[i];
## dsc_files
# If jennifer crashed out in the right place, architecture may still be a string.
if not changes.has_key("architecture") or not isinstance(changes["architecture"], DictType):
changes["architecture"] = { "Unknown" : "" };
- # and maintainer822 may not exist.
- if not changes.has_key("maintainer822"):
- changes["maintainer822"] = self.Cnf["Dinstall::MyEmailAddress"];
+ # and maintainer2047 may not exist.
+ if not changes.has_key("maintainer2047"):
+ changes["maintainer2047"] = self.Cnf["Dinstall::MyEmailAddress"];
Subst["__ARCHITECTURE__"] = " ".join(changes["architecture"].keys());
Subst["__CHANGES_FILENAME__"] = os.path.basename(self.pkg.changes_file);
# For source uploads the Changed-By field wins; otherwise Maintainer wins.
if changes["architecture"].has_key("source") and changes["changedby822"] != "" and (changes["changedby822"] != changes["maintainer822"]):
- Subst["__MAINTAINER_FROM__"] = changes["changedby822"];
- Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] = changes["changedby822"] + ", " + changes["maintainer822"];
+ Subst["__MAINTAINER_FROM__"] = changes["changedby2047"];
+ Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] = "%s, %s" % (changes["changedby2047"],
+ changes["maintainer2047"]);
Subst["__MAINTAINER__"] = changes.get("changed-by", "Unknown");
else:
- Subst["__MAINTAINER_FROM__"] = changes["maintainer822"];
- Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] = changes["maintainer822"];
+ Subst["__MAINTAINER_FROM__"] = changes["maintainer2047"];
+ Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] = changes["maintainer2047"];
Subst["__MAINTAINER__"] = changes.get("maintainer", "Unknown");
if self.Cnf.has_key("Dinstall::TrackingServer") and changes.has_key("source"):
Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] += "\nBcc: %s@%s" % (changes["source"], self.Cnf["Dinstall::TrackingServer"])
return okay
################################################################################
-
+
def in_override_p (self, package, component, suite, binary_type, file):
files = self.pkg.files;
type_id = db_access.get_override_type_id(type);
# FIXME: nasty non-US speficic hack
- if component[:7].lower() == "non-us/":
+ if component.lower().startswith("non-us/"):
component = component[7:];
q = self.projectB.query("SELECT s.section, p.priority FROM override o, section s, priority p WHERE package = '%s' AND suite = %s AND component = %s AND type = %s AND o.section = s.id AND o.priority = p.id"
################################################################################
+ def get_anyversion(self, query_result, suite):
+ anyversion=None
+ anysuite = [suite] + self.Cnf.ValueList("Suite::%s::VersionChecks::Enhances" % (suite))
+ for (v, s) in query_result:
+ if s in [ string.lower(x) for x in anysuite ]:
+ if not anyversion or apt_pkg.VersionCompare(anyversion, v) <= 0:
+ anyversion=v
+ return anyversion
+
+ ################################################################################
+
def cross_suite_version_check(self, query_result, file, new_version):
"""Ensure versions are newer than existing packages in target
suites and that cross-suite version checking rules as
existent_version = entry[0];
suite = entry[1];
if suite in must_be_newer_than and \
- apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, existent_version) != 1:
+ apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, existent_version) < 1:
self.reject("%s: old version (%s) in %s >= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite));
if suite in must_be_older_than and \
- apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, existent_version) != -1:
- self.reject("%s: old version (%s) in %s <= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite));
+ apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, existent_version) > -1:
+ ch = self.pkg.changes
+ cansave = 0
+ if ch.get('distribution-version', {}).has_key(suite):
+ # we really use the other suite, ignoring the conflicting one ...
+ addsuite = ch["distribution-version"][suite]
+
+ add_version = self.get_anyversion(query_result, addsuite)
+ target_version = self.get_anyversion(query_result, target_suite)
+
+ if not add_version:
+ # not add_version can only happen if we map to a suite
+ # that doesn't enhance the suite we're propup'ing from.
+ # so "propup-ver x a b c; map a d" is a problem only if
+ # d doesn't enhance a.
+ #
+ # i think we could always propagate in this case, rather
+ # than complaining. either way, this isn't a REJECT issue
+ #
+ # And - we really should complain to the dorks who configured dak
+ self.reject("%s is mapped to, but not enhanced by %s - adding anyways" % (suite, addsuite), "Warning: ")
+ self.pkg.changes["distribution"][addsuite] = 1
+ cansave = 1
+ elif not target_version:
+ # not targets_version is true when the package is NEW
+ # we could just stick with the "...old version..." REJECT
+ # for this, I think.
+ self.reject("Won't propogate NEW packages.")
+ elif apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, add_version) < 0:
+ # propogation would be redundant. no need to reject though.
+ #self.reject("ignoring versionconflict: %s: old version (%s) in %s <= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite), "Warning: ");
+ self.reject("foo", "Warning: ")
+ cansave = 1
+ elif apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, add_version) > 0 and \
+ apt_pkg.VersionCompare(add_version, target_version) == 0:
+ # propogate!!
+ self.pkg.changes["distribution"][addsuite] = 1
+ cansave = 1
+
+ if not cansave:
+ self.reject("%s: old version (%s) in %s <= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite));
################################################################################
actual_size = int(files[dsc_file]["size"]);
found = "%s in incoming" % (dsc_file)
# Check the file does not already exist in the archive
- q = self.projectB.query("SELECT size, md5sum, filename FROM files WHERE filename LIKE '%%%s%%'" % (dsc_file));
-
+ q = self.projectB.query("SELECT f.size, f.md5sum, l.path, f.filename FROM files f, location l WHERE f.filename LIKE '%%%s%%' AND l.id = f.location" % (dsc_file));
ql = q.getresult();
# Strip out anything that isn't '%s' or '/%s$'
for i in ql:
- if i[2] != dsc_file and i[2][-(len(dsc_file)+1):] != '/'+dsc_file:
+ if i[3] != dsc_file and i[3][-(len(dsc_file)+1):] != '/'+dsc_file:
ql.remove(i);
# "[katie] has not broken them. [katie] has fixed a
files[dsc_file]["md5sum"] == i[1]:
self.reject("ignoring %s, since it's already in the archive." % (dsc_file), "Warning: ");
del files[dsc_file];
+ self.pkg.orig_tar_gz = i[2] + i[3];
match = 1;
if not match:
projects / dak.git / blobdiff