Whatever the difference between the summary and the subject field is: We

[dak.git] / daklib / queue.py

diff --git a/daklib/queue.py b/daklib/queue.py
index afd3277840ed153b7972eba59191eb19623b04f6..c5e6ca74c7b8103efa7c342adacdbcdf291c5035 100755 (executable)
--- a/daklib/queue.py
+++ b/daklib/queue.py
@@ -329,11 +329,18 @@ class Upload(object):
             self.Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] = self.pkg.changes["maintainer2047"]
             self.Subst["__MAINTAINER__"] = self.pkg.changes.get("maintainer", "Unknown")
 
-        session = DBConn().session()
-        fpr = get_fingerprint(self.pkg.changes['fingerprint'], session)
-        if self.check_if_upload_is_sponsored("%s@debian.org" % fpr.uid.uid, fpr.uid.name):
-            self.Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] += ", %s" % self.pkg.changes["sponsoremail"]
-        session.close()
+        # Process policy doesn't set the fingerprint field and I don't want to make it
+        # do it for now as I don't want to have to deal with the case where we accepted
+        # the package into PU-NEW, but the fingerprint has gone away from the keyring in
+        # the meantime so the package will be remarked as rejectable.  Urgh.
+        # TODO: Fix this properly
+        if self.pkg.changes.has_key('fingerprint'):
+            session = DBConn().session()
+            fpr = get_fingerprint(self.pkg.changes['fingerprint'], session)
+            if fpr and self.check_if_upload_is_sponsored("%s@debian.org" % fpr.uid.uid, fpr.uid.name):
+                if self.pkg.changes.has_key("sponsoremail"):
+                    self.Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] += ", %s" % self.pkg.changes["sponsoremail"]
+            session.close()
 
         if cnf.has_key("Dinstall::TrackingServer") and self.pkg.changes.has_key("source"):
             self.Subst["__MAINTAINER_TO__"] += "\nBcc: %s@%s" % (self.pkg.changes["source"], cnf["Dinstall::TrackingServer"])
@@ -346,6 +353,7 @@ class Upload(object):
         self.Subst["__REJECT_MESSAGE__"] = self.package_info()
         self.Subst["__SOURCE__"] = self.pkg.changes.get("source", "Unknown")
         self.Subst["__VERSION__"] = self.pkg.changes.get("version", "Unknown")
+        self.Subst["__SUITE__"] = ", ".join(self.pkg.changes["distribution"])
 
     ###########################################################################
     def load_changes(self, filename):
@@ -1931,7 +1939,6 @@ distribution."""
             UrgencyLog().log(self.pkg.dsc["source"], self.pkg.dsc["version"], self.pkg.changes["urgency"])
 
         self.update_subst()
-        self.Subst["__SUITE__"] = ""
         self.Subst["__SUMMARY__"] = summary
         mail_message = utils.TemplateSubst(self.Subst,
                                            os.path.join(cnf["Dir::Templates"], 'process-unchecked.accepted'))
@@ -2612,45 +2619,6 @@ distribution."""
                 if not self.in_override_p(entry["package"], entry["component"], suite, entry.get("dbtype",""), checkfile, session):
                     self.rejects.append("%s is NEW for %s." % (checkfile, suite))
 
-    ################################################################################
-    # This is not really a reject, but an unaccept, but since a) the code for
-    # that is non-trivial (reopen bugs, unannounce etc.), b) this should be
-    # extremely rare, for now we'll go with whining at our admin folks...
-
-    def do_unaccept(self):
-        cnf = Config()
-
-        self.update_subst()
-        self.Subst["__REJECTOR_ADDRESS__"] = cnf["Dinstall::MyEmailAddress"]
-        self.Subst["__REJECT_MESSAGE__"] = self.package_info()
-        self.Subst["__CC__"] = "Cc: " + cnf["Dinstall::MyEmailAddress"]
-        self.Subst["__BCC__"] = "X-DAK: dak process-accepted"
-        if cnf.has_key("Dinstall::Bcc"):
-            self.Subst["__BCC__"] += "\nBcc: %s" % (cnf["Dinstall::Bcc"])
-
-        template = os.path.join(cnf["Dir::Templates"], "process-accepted.unaccept")
-
-        reject_mail_message = utils.TemplateSubst(self.Subst, template)
-
-        # Write the rejection email out as the <foo>.reason file
-        reason_filename = os.path.basename(self.pkg.changes_file[:-8]) + ".reason"
-        reject_filename = os.path.join(cnf["Dir::Queue::Reject"], reason_filename)
-
-        # If we fail here someone is probably trying to exploit the race
-        # so let's just raise an exception ...
-        if os.path.exists(reject_filename):
-            os.unlink(reject_filename)
-
-        fd = os.open(reject_filename, os.O_RDWR|os.O_CREAT|os.O_EXCL, 0644)
-        os.write(fd, reject_mail_message)
-        os.close(fd)
-
-        utils.send_mail(reject_mail_message)
-
-        del self.Subst["__REJECTOR_ADDRESS__"]
-        del self.Subst["__REJECT_MESSAGE__"]
-        del self.Subst["__CC__"]
-
     ################################################################################
     # If any file of an upload has a recent mtime then chances are good
     # the file is still being uploaded.