Others
------
+ o reject sparc64 binaries in a non '*64*' package.
+
o katie.py(source_exists): a) we take arguments as parameters that
we could figure out for ourselves (we're part of the Katie class
after all), b) we have this 3rd argument which defaults to "any"
unless its "/msg ircop I fucked your wife."
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+<aj> ooo, elmo has "special powers"
+<neuro> ooo, does he have lasers that shoot out of his eyes?
+<aj> dunno
+<aj> maybe he can turn invisible? that'd sure help with improved transparency!
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
+
+| From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
+| Subject: Re: [PATCH] Compile kernel with GCC-3.5 and without regparm
+| To: "Art Haas" <ahaas@airmail.net>
+| Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+| Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:59:28 -0800
+| X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu)
+|
+| "Art Haas" <ahaas@airmail.net> wrote:
+| >
+| > I tried to build the kernel with my CVS GCC-3.5 compiler today, and had
+| > all sorts of failures about prototypes not matching.
+|
+| -mm is where the gcc-3.5 action is. There seems to be a bit of an arms
+| race going on wherein the gcc developers are trying to break the kernel
+| build faster than I and others can fix it.
+
+%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%