[An updated version of the proposal sent to debian-devel-announce@l.d.o. Debian-specific, but useful as a general overview of New Incoming.] New Incoming System =================== This document outlines the new system for handling Incoming directories on ftp-master and non-US. The old system: --------------- o incoming was a world writable directory o incoming was available to everyone through http://incoming.debian.org/ o incoming was processed once a day by dinstall o uploads in incoming had to have been there > 24 hours before they were REJECTed. If they were processed before that and had problems they were SKIPped (with no notification to the maintainer and/or uploader). The new system: --------------- o There's 4 incoming directories: @ "unchecked" - where uploads from Queue Daemons and maintainers initially go. @ "accepted" - where accepted packages stay until the daily dinstall run. @ "new" - where NEW packages (and their dependents[1]) requiring human processing go after being automatically checked by dinstall. @ "byhand" - where BYHAND packages (and their dependents[1]) requiring human intervention go after being automatically checked by dinstall. In addition there's 3 support directories: @ "reject" - where rejected uploads go @ "done" - where the .changes files for packages that have been installed go. @ "holding" - a temporary working area for dinstall to hold packages while checking them. o Packages in 'unchecked' are automatically checked every 15 minutes and are either: REJECT, ACCEPT, NEW or BYHAND. o Only 'unchecked' is locally world-writeable. The others are all, of course, locally world-readable but only 'accepted' and 'byhand' are publicly visible on http://incoming.debian.org/ o 'accepted' and 'byhand' are made available to the auto-builders so they can build out of them. o 'accepted' is processed once a day as before. o Maintainer/uploader & list notification and bug closures are changed to be done for ACCEPTs, not INSTALLs. [Rationale: this reduces the load both on our list server and our BTS server; it also gives people better notice of uploads to avoid duplication of work especially, for example, in the case of NMUs.] [NB: see [3] for clarifications of when mails are sent.] Why: ---- o Security (no more replaceable file races) o Integrity (new http://i.d.o contains only signed (+installable) uploads[2]) o Needed for crypto-in-main integration o Allows safe auto-building out of accepted o Allows previously-prohibitively-expensive checks to be added to dinstall o Much faster feedback on packages; no more 48 hour waits before finding out your package has been REJECTed. What breaks: ------------ o people who upload packages but then want to retract or replace the upload. * solution: mostly "Don't do that then"; i.e. test your uploads properly. Uploads can still be replaced, simply by uploading a higher versioned replacement. Total retraction is harder but usually only relevant for NEW packages. ================================================================================ [1] For versions of dependents meaning: binaries compiled from the source of BYHAND or NEW uploads. Due to dak's fascist source-must-exist checking, these binaries must be held back until the BYHAND/NEW uploads are processed. [2] When this mail was initially written there was still at least one upload queue which will accept unsigned uploads from any source. [I've since discovered it's been deactivated, but not, AFAIK because it allowed unsigned uploads.] [3] --> reject / / unchecked -----------------------------[*]------> accepted ---------------> pool \ ^ ^ | / / |--> new -- / | |[4] / | V / |--> byhand --/ [4] This is a corner case, included for completeness, ignore it. [Boring details: NEW trumps BYHAND, so it's possible for a upload with both BYHAND and NEW components to go from 'unchecked' -> 'new' -> 'byhand' -> 'accepted']