From 3b83346a8e807881e0b0733d41cb14368cb7e329 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:23:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] criteria

fixed html errors. made dsa paragraph more weasel compatible :)

Signed-off-by: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
---
 web/archive-criteria.html | 14 +++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/web/archive-criteria.html b/web/archive-criteria.html
index 4f99ad0e..79bc6428 100644
--- a/web/archive-criteria.html
+++ b/web/archive-criteria.html
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
 	<ul>
 	  <li>A newly included architecture has to be completely built using
 	  packages available in plain Debian sources.  External patches cannot
-	  be used.<li>
+	  be used.</li>
 
 	  <li>At the time of inclusion a minimal set of binary packages will be
 	  imported into the archive, just enough to get build-essential ready to
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
 
 	  <li>There must be at least two machines ready to be maintained
 	  by the Debian System Administrators, so at the start of its
-	  lifetime there will be at least one buildd and one porter machine.</br />
+	  lifetime there will be at least one buildd and one porter machine.<br />
 
 	  The inclusion into the archive will almost certainly happen before
 	  the machines are handed over to DSA, but this should happen as
@@ -110,7 +110,15 @@
 
 	  (Note that this is the minimum to get into the archive. The release team
 	  may have additional requirements to allow the architecture to release, so
-	  there would normally need to be more machines, especially more buildds.)
+	  there would normally need to be more machines, especially more
+	  buildds.)<br />
+
+	  <b>Note:</b> The machines, their setup and hosting etc should be
+	  coordinated with DSA and needs to be acceptable to DSA. Please
+	  <a href="mailto:debian-admin@lists.debian.org">coordinate with
+	  them</a>, they might be able to help you in more ways
+	  you can imagine, but at least they can help to avoid useless work
+	  if a hosting wouldnt be acceptable. :)
 	  </li>
 	</ul>
 
-- 
2.39.2