+ def get_anyversion(self, query_result, suite):
+ anyversion=None
+ anysuite = [suite] + self.Cnf.ValueList("Suite::%s::VersionChecks::Enhances" % (suite))
+ for (v, s) in query_result:
+ if s in [ string.lower(x) for x in anysuite ]:
+ if not anyversion or apt_pkg.VersionCompare(anyversion, v) <= 0:
+ anyversion=v
+ return anyversion
+
+ ################################################################################
+
+ def cross_suite_version_check(self, query_result, file, new_version):
+ """Ensure versions are newer than existing packages in target
+ suites and that cross-suite version checking rules as
+ set out in the conf file are satisfied."""
+
+ # Check versions for each target suite
+ for target_suite in self.pkg.changes["distribution"].keys():
+ must_be_newer_than = map(string.lower, self.Cnf.ValueList("Suite::%s::VersionChecks::MustBeNewerThan" % (target_suite)));
+ must_be_older_than = map(string.lower, self.Cnf.ValueList("Suite::%s::VersionChecks::MustBeOlderThan" % (target_suite)));
+ # Enforce "must be newer than target suite" even if conffile omits it
+ if target_suite not in must_be_newer_than:
+ must_be_newer_than.append(target_suite);
+ for entry in query_result:
+ existent_version = entry[0];
+ suite = entry[1];
+ if suite in must_be_newer_than and \
+ apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, existent_version) < 1:
+ self.reject("%s: old version (%s) in %s >= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite));
+ if suite in must_be_older_than and \
+ apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, existent_version) > -1:
+ ch = self.pkg.changes
+ cansave = 0
+ if ch.get('distribution-version', {}).has_key(suite):
+ # we really use the other suite, ignoring the conflicting one ...
+ addsuite = ch["distribution-version"][suite]
+
+ add_version = self.get_anyversion(query_result, addsuite)
+ target_version = self.get_anyversion(query_result, target_suite)
+
+ if not add_version:
+ # not add_version can only happen if we map to a suite
+ # that doesn't enhance the suite we're propup'ing from.
+ # so "propup-ver x a b c; map a d" is a problem only if
+ # d doesn't enhance a.
+ #
+ # i think we could always propagate in this case, rather
+ # than complaining. either way, this isn't a REJECT issue
+ #
+ # And - we really should complain to the dorks who configured dak
+ self.reject("%s is mapped to, but not enhanced by %s - adding anyways" % (suite, addsuite), "Warning: ")
+ self.pkg.changes.setdefault("propdistribution", {})
+ self.pkg.changes["propdistribution"][addsuite] = 1
+ cansave = 1
+ elif not target_version:
+ # not targets_version is true when the package is NEW
+ # we could just stick with the "...old version..." REJECT
+ # for this, I think.
+ self.reject("Won't propogate NEW packages.")
+ elif apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, add_version) < 0:
+ # propogation would be redundant. no need to reject though.
+ self.reject("ignoring versionconflict: %s: old version (%s) in %s <= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite), "Warning: ")
+ cansave = 1
+ elif apt_pkg.VersionCompare(new_version, add_version) > 0 and \
+ apt_pkg.VersionCompare(add_version, target_version) >= 0:
+ # propogate!!
+ self.reject("Propogating upload to %s" % (addsuite), "Warning: ")
+ self.pkg.changes.setdefault("propdistribution", {})
+ self.pkg.changes["propdistribution"][addsuite] = 1
+ cansave = 1
+
+ if not cansave:
+ self.reject("%s: old version (%s) in %s <= new version (%s) targeted at %s." % (file, existent_version, suite, new_version, target_suite))
+
+ ################################################################################
+
+ def check_binary_against_db(self, file):